Monday, September 10, 2012

real_pr_pro (@)

Posted Monday 10th September 2012 from Twitlonger
Anyone who has been frustrated at the free pass accorded Sanders and the media's apparent lack of interest in questioning how this incident became public MUST read this analysis from a poster named Robin Van Dam on a blog called Crushable.com.


Nothing and no one in the past seven weeks had done a better job of summing up what I think many of us have suspected from Day One, and what we have waited in vain for the mainstream media to pursue, better than this brilliant and unlflinching analysis of what motivated a predator and his ruthless enabler, posted six days ago by Robin Van Dam.



Many thanks to for calling this to my attention.

Original post can be found athttp://crushable.com/entertainment/robert-pattinson-kristen-stewart-cheating-reactions-ridiculous-432/


"Mr. Sanders is the type of man with whom I am very familiar. He is the type
of person that befriends you to use you and get as much from you at the
slightest possible cost to himself. He is a risk taker at the risk of others,
knowing, well in advance, what his goal is, what his chances of success are,
and what his level of exposure will be, well before he plays the game. He
begins to size you up at first contact and zeros in on your most vulnerable
characteristics. He is the top of the food chain, a predator, watching every
move of his prey, categorizing their ticks, and carefully calculating his
advantages over their weaknesses. His relationships, especially with women, are
brief and to the point, hunting for the easiest target, like a lion, usually
going for the young and inexperienced to conserve his energy or exposure. He
minimizes his damages with promises or threats, depending on their weaknesses,
as he lures them in for the kill and savors the delicacies of his conquests
with an insatiable, narcissistic pleasure.

He targets his prey based on his level of risk and exposure, knowing, the
higher the profile, the lower the risk of exposure. He disregards what is
morally, humanely, and civilly right. He takes advantage of his power over his
prey, regardless of the consequences and harm imposed. He leaves them wounded
with overwhelming guilt, self-loathing, feelings of worthlessness, and
depression, allowing him to return to devour them over, and over, again, at his
leisure. His position of authority allows him the luxury of praise or
displeasure, knowing his prey will either be grateful or crumble into
submission and he will receive the fruits of his labor, willingly, leaving them
hungry for more or unsatisfied with their need to please him so they are worthy
of his good graces. The situation of emotional distress, naïveté, and
vulnerability allows him to nurture his prey, in a fatherly stature, insuring
their loyalty, love, respect and tight lips, limiting his exposure to the bare
minimum. He believes he is top dog and invincible. He respects no one below his
own egotistical importance. (Continued)

To be precise, Mr. Pattinson, you are what Mr. Sanders deems below him, more
than anyone else. You were his true target. He had to prove to himself, and
you, he had the power to take what he wanted, away from anyone, even someone as
beloved as you are. He had to prove he was the stronger, more desired, more
dominant male in town. I like to think of his type as “Caesar” and you are his
“Spartacus.” Ms. Stewart was nothing more than a tool for him to punish you for
your successes and over shadowing his prominence during his hour of glory. It
ate away at him that his talents could not be recognized without your name
boosting his production of SWATH because of your relationship with Ms. Stewart.
You had nothing to do with SWATH! How dare you overshadow his work, his
talents, and his creativity with the mere mention of your name! You are a lowly
actor! He is the almighty director!

What better way to knock you down a peg or two than to take the one thing
you treasure most. Ms. Stewart was your vulnerability as much as you were hers
and when you add her naïveté to the mix, neither one of you had a chance
against the evil that hides in the hearts of men such as Rupert Sanders. You
are nothing more than immature, naïve children in his eyes, and he knew he could
crush you, both, with one blow. That is exactly what he did for the sake of
fame. (Continued)

He is winning. Ms. Stewart is a harlot, shunned righteously by you, the
media, and the public, while Mr. Sanders, in a few short months, will receive
pats on the back by his colleagues, and asked, “So, what was it like, you know,
with Kristen? Was she worth it?” I won’t go further. You get the picture. Men
are men when they cheat. Women are worthless harlots, damaged goods, and no
longer fit to be seen with in public, when events such as these are revealed.
It is always the woman’s fault, her seduction, her choice and her selfishness.
Women are evil and the temptation of man. Men are the weak victims, unable to
utter the word, “No” at the sight of a beautiful woman and unable to resist his
own perversions in his mind because she put them there just by being a
beautiful, desirable woman in his sights. (Continued)

Mrs. Sanders, well let’s be nice and say I have my suspicions. She’s not
well known in these parts, virtually invisible, until this event, and lonely,
looking to liven up her boring, mundane motherly life with a new acting career.
She was totally discontent with her new home and the extended absence of her
poor, weak victim of a husband, not to mention sexless marriage. She said so,
herself. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure out her part in all this.
If I had to guess, I would bet she was heading to a divorce attorney long
before this event and was the one that tipped the paparazzo. She too, has benefited
from this event. Gee, how many offers do you think she has received for
modeling, interviews, and more importantly, acting? She’s playing the innocent
wife victim of Ms. Stewart’s irresistible temptations toward her weak victim of
a husband, perfectly. I can’t help but wonder how long it took them to plan the
whole thing. Those pictures, told me much more than I bet they expected anyone
to see. I saw ‘set-up’ from the get go! The biggest give away were the two
pictures of Mr. Sanders looking straight into the camera. The one by the
railing looks like he was gesturing, “Did you get that?” (Continued)

You heard Mr. Sanders, “I am utterly distraught about the pain I have caused
my family. My beautiful wife and heavenly children are all I have in this world.
I love them with all my heart. I am praying that we can get through this
together.” It was a staged apology, cold with no hint of sincerity in his voice
or sweat on his brow. Praying? Oh, he didn’t mean what it seems he meant! He
flubbed his words! He forgot the last three! “I’m praying that we can get
through this together, without getting caught!” You’ve read his other comment,
“I would do absolutely anything and everything to save my marriage.” Yeah, I
believe that. How about this lie, “It was the worst mistake of my life.” Let me
hear Mrs. Sanders say that. She’s riding on a high horse with wings, right
about now. (Continued)

Wow, what a trade off and complete role reversal, “The demise of Kristen
Stewart’s acting career for the rise of Liberty Sanders.” Who is overshadowing
whom, now? It makes me so sad to see people do this to each other. Do I just
have an over active, devious mind? I feel ashamed of myself for being no better
than the tabloids. Please forgive me for not erasing this evil trash, but if I
can see it, and think it, do you really think it’s that farfetched? I am just a
normal person, sitting on the outside, looking in. I believe the Sanders,
without Ms. Stewart’s knowledge, orchestrated it and she truly is as much a
victim as you. The Sanders have destroyed so much goodness and it is painful. I
am so sorry. I hope you see what I see and salvage yourselves, together or
separately, it doesn’t matter, as long as you both survive with your heads held
high.

Why is it the woman's responsibility to say "NO" and it's
"OK" for a married man to seduce, approach or say "Yes" to
his sexual urges instead of him being responsible enough at 41 yrs. old to
fight those urges, even if he is the one approached?"



No comments:

Post a Comment